Without her she gets made, a kind of other, malformation of sex. She needs persona and identity of her own. What does she make of herself, of this lot? Out of these forms of hers. She must build herself.

Character of mist that makes you feel cold inside. Her reputation precedes her, irregular person, despicable.  She is what you heard, you think. What you made of her in your mind via your and other people’s speech. Isn’t she. Talk works like clay. Story of her could be continued in this way unless she would not act for her defense. Get that clay into her own hands. She needs herself to oppose, resist and defend herself. Nobody else does it. Nobody else is interested in her life. Her life what it really is, what she really is like and able to do. Her reality is not interesting to anybody but herself, she lives it, not you and makes it interesting. She makes her life even there is discouragement, contempt, laughter, ill talk, threat, there is so little faith in her that it is unbelievable and unbearable. To accept passively what goes on and on, because others accept it, it suits them and they say there is nothing one can do, for her it is not an option. That is her exceptional quality, active resistance, energy of hers.

Evaluations, descriptions, adjectives, measurements and comparisons, faults, flaws, drawbacks. Qualities we need. Qualities we have made us and what are they worth, how do qualities change. We imagine, make, consume and refine ourselves.

She is not right. Characteristics that is stated as a fact without further evidence than hearsay. Demonizing her to people who listen. Who asked about her. Without her she gets made. As if she died. Character of mist that makes you feel cold inside. Is this the same world we inhabit? You speak of me, but you do not confront me nor speak to me. How little respect there is, how little trust. She is what you heard as a fact. To think otherwise would be unthinkable. Thinkable pleasure, envious joy of dragging her down speaks mountains. She is not right.

She is not right. To kill is to entertain. It is to better yourself. To paint a picture of malicious woman is to draw a separating line. Pointing her out from above, from a distance, from acclaimed perfection, from accepted shameless perfection undeniable.

To know her is to say what she is. She is loud, she is noisy, she is quiet, she is broken, she is tense, she is irrational, she is shameless, she is lost, she is dead.

 

Those who do not vote let fascists win.

Be wise.

Why the need to label and categorize?

What is the meaning of waves in feminism? There are and have taken place four waves of feminism to this day. Do they all add something new to image of womanhood, femininity, idea of being a woman or is it about finding out. Breaking boundaries is what is needed to be heard and listened to. Radicalism is essential part of feminism therefore I do not understand why there are differently named movements inside feminism for example radical feminism is one part of feminism. It is not all radical? For what I know all feminism has been radical and continues to be so. Radical in its marginal position, strangely distant, when impact of feminism on the world is perceived. To me femin-isms are all part of one and the same need to be whole in finding dignity and are one movement.

Aren’t waves of feminism reactions in time to people who are stuck to their traditions, rules and beliefs so much that want to decide for women’s lives and bodies and especially those. In that thought wave is a good word to describe a happening of feminism, attack and sudden burst of rage and emotion.

 

Sanoa olen feministi. Kuinka sanon sen? Miksi en sanoisi? Milloin sanon niin? Kuka haluaa tietää? Sanoa edustavansa jotakin ideologiaa. Mitä feminismi oikein tarkoittaa?

Oikeudet olla kokonaisvaltainen kokonainen ihminen, määräysvaltainen omaan kehoonsa ja mieleensä sekä kuinka maailmassa on ja itseänsä toteuttaa. Se on paljon, vaikka kuulostaa itsestäänselvyydeltä. Olla ihminen. Mutta sehän on riittävä, silti vaikea ja miltei mahdoton. Kiinnostus feminismiin ja feministiksi itsensä määrittely juontuu siitä että on tullut väärin kohdelluksi naisena ja tyttönä. Omakohtainen kokemus konkretisoituu haluksi muuttaa asemansa. Mitä väkivaltaisempi alkutilanne sitä voimakkaampi vastustus ja keinot. Nykyfeministit ajavat tasa-arvoa ja ihmisoikeuksia kaikille sukupuoleen katsomatta. Mahdollisimman tasa-arvoista maailmaa, mikä on ihanan utooppinen ajatelma. Mutta moni feministien saavuttamista asioista ovat paino-arvoltaan mittavia, kuten naisten äänioikeus, oikeus omaisuuteen, työssä käymiseen, oikeus päättää omasta kehostaa ja kenen kanssa menee naimisiin jne. lista on huima. Feminismin vaikutus kaikkien ihmisten elämään saavutusten valossa on järkälemäinen. Koska naisten oikeudet ja hyvinvointi heijastuu suoraan perheeseen ja yhteiskunnan hyvinvointiin.

Olen tiedostanut olevani feministi kauan aikaa, ja tietoinen naisen asemasta maailmassa. Hämmästelen sanan aiheuttamaa kohinaa. Millaisia tunteita feminismi herättää. Se on jotakin kiellettyä. En käsitä. Samojen oikeuksien vaatiminen naisille kuin miehille on jotakin väärin. Mikä hirveä tappelu täytyy käydä läpi, jotta saavutettaisiin tasa-arvo, edelleen. Feminismi on voimakkaasti poliittinen termi, oikeudellinen, naisellinen, arvottava, puolustuksellinen ja hyökkäävä.  On hyökättävä vastaan saadakseen jotakin aikaan. Oltava tiukka ja vaadittava, mentävä rajojen yli, rikottava omat kynnykset ja kärsittävä asiansa puolesta. Se kenties feminismissä pelottaa ja työntää luotaan. Naisten on täytynyt mennä ääreen ponnistuksissaan parempien oikeuksien puolesta. Uhmata ja uhrata terveytensä ja vapautensa, maineensa, kaikki mahdollinen. Sellainen on pelottavaa, lopullista. Nainen joka tietää mitä haluaa on pelottava. Tietoinen, älykäs ja itsenäinen on uhka. Toki jokainen voi valita mihin uskoo ja mitä asioita vie eteenpäin, mutta silti ihmettelen miksei jokainen ole feministi. Feministillä ei ole mitään pelättävää.

päivän paras: hotlinekeskusteluyhteys P-Korean ja E-Korean välillä vuodesta 1971, (kiroilua)

” It gives us pleasure to mention that due to significant improvements in our procedures, our current expected average accuracy is nearly 95.0%. Actually, we might be operating in a near zero error phase because every sample is being tested by newly developed color procedures. This may not be taken to mean that we are absolutely perfect, but we are now in a position to compete with well-known gender determining technologies like CVS and amniocentesis. Furthermore, since we can detect the gender AS SOON AS ONE CAN DO THE PREGNANCY TEST, we have become the earliest in the world in this field.” http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/p/247413/2346539.aspx

Taateleilla intohimoisiin sfääreihin, c-vitamiinia!

tanssi