When you are born a girl. Don’t u want to b wanted?

Älä pelkää/Don’t be afraid, photocut on wall, 2012

The experience of growing up as a girl is important in becoming a woman, it’s defining. Not only the body parts that you’ll have tell of sex, but female is not a feeling nor an idea that can be artificially built. To have a vagina is not the only thing to have to be female, if it was so simple as operating the outer sexual organs you to change your sex, we’d be very simple organisms indeed and simplicity and functionality is what we as modern humans aim at. We do look at others as appearances and make judgments based on what we see. But we are simple even the thought of it is repulsive. We are very complex (never forget) and that complexity makes us human and beautifully unique on this planet. This is one reason I defend women’s right to be called women not menstruators or bleeders or what other horrid names men have invented to wipe women’s rights and our significance as humans, creators and caretakers out. Mother is much more than just a birthing person. To simplify a person via the act of giving birth, what is that? What motivation there is to simplify a person? They are never good. That is a tale from dystopian world where women are birthing people and that is their sole purpose. What happens via and in women’s bodies is via this new speech making women instrumental, like technicality talk and women should accept it. It is pure objectification as is all plastic surgery and imitation of women, ultra femininity as it is called at its most extremist, a fetish making the doll woman an ideal and call her beautiful is what she wants to hear.

To silence women for speaking out against this nonsense and body fascism, I don’t find it any different from chauvinism, traditionalism and misogyny. It is regressive and abusive. Boycotting women who defend girls’ and women’s rights is the same old and to have this forced upon is to belittle our voices, bodies and minds. Our need for our spaces, safety, our reasoning to be heard and our experiences as more than just bodies are important, they are fought rights and must be protected because they are not self-evident. To be a woman is not celebrated by terms such as cervix-havers and chest-feeders,breast-feeders, it is humiliating to hear females become their body parts only. It is resentful and ugly to even have this kind of fight in contemporary world. Mind you freedom of speech and opinion. I don’t accept delusions for facts and forcing this new ‘education’ on all of us isn’t freedom. It is infantile and vengeful.

As I have experienced it, to be a girl is very different than being a boy. Boys did more exciting things and at some point I was not allowed to participate anymore as I aged out growing breasts and stuff. Boys and girls bully each other which is normal, girls are also sexually harassed by adults. The differences between sexes exist to large extent and massively so, that to minimize it, is foolish and untruthful, like white working class girls’ experiences can be more violent and abusive still in today’s world and nobody notices. Something easily accessible and to discard. When you have no money, you do not have power. Girls are cruel against other girls too. I suppose it is a way of competition and something go through. To be different is the worst thing, but what can you do, adapt or perish? Neither is an option. A girl must be very careful and learn it, it is a tightrope on which a girl learns to balance. One has to learn that you can be groped in broad daylight in the middle of a school yard and that is fun for boys, they do it in groups. They continue this to adulthood and think women don’t know. Some don’t. Grouping is important for most humans, see tribalism. To me it is a sign of weakness, but a group is powerful even (especially) in stupidity. That you can be stalked, you will be checked up as long as you look alright for males by the appearance, pedigree, inheritance, that is all that matters, how you can benefit them. You will be measured by your looks always, that never ends. Your intelligence is under constant scrutiny. It is a way to use power over you, that never ends. Testing you never ends. So how does a girl become empowered? For me the number one thing has been education, the only thing since looks is not that interesting to me in a person, for others it is probably the most interesting thing, as a girl I was shook by this: I am my body and that should empower me. To be beautiful is everything and nothing. So what is me? Who is this person and what is she to become?

Like today you are your body and that is it, it is your measure, it is a message. You become you when you can fix things that bother you in your body. Why things bother people is because of other people. Everything in your body is noticed, cellulite, fat, wrinkles, legs, hips, ass, thighs, lips, hair, neck, skin, breasts, smells, calves, nose and body hair. You can disturb all this by doing the opposite. Freak people out, it is easy for a girl. We should follow instructions and when we don’t we stick out.

As a girl I was more scared and timid, also I was looked at in a different kind of way like I had less potential and I was less important. I guess I had that scared look on my face which made it even worse, me an easy target. So, don’t be scared or don’t show it. We are still animals. And learn to question everything, especially the authority. They don’t like, it is reason enough. To be liked is not a sufficient aim in life. When they find out your potential, the reactions can be primitive. Equality talk is often just that, talk.

Finding potential where there isn’t any, yeah it’s a dead-end, as is pleasing everyone .

SIZE OF ART: THE THINGS YOU CAN TELL BY CHOOSING SIZE. PLAYING WITH SIZE IS TO PLAY WITH OUR minds and EYES, PERCEPTION and assumptions on what is art, ATTENTION seeking AND WAYS WE ARE USED TO LOOKING at and measuring THINGS. (I love NY)

Importance of art, what is important art? Where lies the interest when we look at art depending on what are we measuring when we measure art? What we look for, why art is there to be measured is for someone to profit? By what standards? We measure the price, fame, name, skill, connections, where the artist is based and so forth. Why all the measuring and paying attention to surface is so important especially in art, or is it just the problem of this branch only? Obviously not. Seek to impress and making it gets desperate when competition is heavy and the place is very desired. Is it the social side behind desire and lust for grandiose there to be understood? Is it just pure greed and need for power and showoff, because what can be deducted is quality is not how art is measured? Art has to be placed or left out as are artists in or out? Question of size of art and what gets attention is always interesting. As an artist as I write about attention can mean it is I who wants attention, but of course. There is always the self-interest, suspicion, egoism which are attached to art, to this social event of art, social aspects of doing the whole business of art, business of what, publicity and talking about art, writing about it, being there, seen that. Big possibilities lure spineless crooks who wish to make the best profit there is possible to make. You live in New York, do you now, how interesting.

The same problematics in size goes with architecture and size of corporations, thinking the bigger equals the better. The better and something good in the world of today is a matter of magnitude, impact, conspicuousness, ability to make stature and scale that impresses. To be impressed in an instant, to be in awe, be taken and one’s breath away by something that has required skill to achieve. It is a goal by which art in traditional sense is seen and meaning of making art is to prove skill (natural?), professionality, business-likeness and trustworthiness, valuable in a world where machinery, factories, technical thinking (gadgets) prevail over everything and as true signs of intellect (smart), as best human abilities and as male. Big size as a masculine feature is an all covering norm with a shadow to impress conquering attention and winning like in sports or wherever. It is not unusual to own and aggressively protect that tradition in art by diminishing countering opinions and this all shadowing view of massiveness. Dominance is the only way to do things in this kind of mental atmosphere, you dominate or you don’t. Anything small is pathetic and cute, seen as too small and insignificant: big is self-evidently good and acceptable, heavy and solid, lasting. What a horrible weakness that is to all of art and artists to seek massiveness in every way is to be noticed. It is to diminish and kill anything else which everything else would mean variety of points of views and ways of making.

Meet Chinese lady

Meet Chinese lady. Feel lonely? Seek a loyal Chinese girl to warm up your soul.

Revolution: the motion of an object around a point, especially round another object or a centre of mass. A single complete cycle of such motion.

Usage: in everyday speech revolution and rotation are often used as synonyms, but in science they are not synonyms and have distinct meanings. The difference between the two terms lies in the location of the central axis that the object turns about. If the axis is outside the body itself that is, if the object is orbiting about another object then one complete orbit is called a revolution. But if the object is turning about an axis that passes trough itself, then one complete cycle is called a rotation. This difference is often summed up in the statement: Earth rotates on its axis and revolves around the Sun.

The American Heritage, science dictionary.