I must publish this article, I just must.

http://hyperallergic.com/348594/the-20-most-powerless-people-in-the-art-world-2016-edition/

My knee

https://varoufakis.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/varoufakis-moscow-keynote.pdf “Now of course culture is becoming commodified. This is being acciomplished by expert gallerists, post modernized by cunning curators, sanitized through the meat grinder of the European commission’s funding formulae for the arts. Göring never understood that he had no need for his revolver.”..”You folks in here, you artists and curators, should be feared by the powerful in our societies. If you are not considered dangerous by the powers-that-be, you are not doing your job properly. As long as culture resists commodification, it is going to be a great threat for those who use commodification in order to extend their own realm as far and further afield as possible.

For people who feel inadequate and scared: process of error and process to correcting error made. How to recognize error, what it is, what size is it, what does it do, how significant is it?

To be passing, like something temporary casual but compulsory, not quite knowing
but need to understand is there. Not necessarily desire to ask why but what, does not let go.

the ever
greatest
did
most

 

What is good for art and what is art good for?

Could it be the question of what makes art become and stay solid good, grow in monetary value? What we appreciate in general and in art is what is good in general and in art or what we haven’t become to notice and pay attention to make art good, interesting and worth while? It is something to expect or a surprise. Or something ordinary depicted in a different way, multiple ways to see something is also good for art or to play it safe? When art is used to benefit a cause will we see evolving art or art in use to benefit the cause firstly? What do you think? I think when bureaucrats see their job to solve the issue of good art and make art promote a city for example it is never benefit of art. It is because bureaucrat sees himself/herself superior and artist inferior, a servant,  even though it should be the bureaucrat who is a servant. Artist who may be a curiously interesting field study, funny oddity and specimen to put in use, to talk about. It is not a case of community serving arts or artists having an important role other than making an image, pretty preferably.