Sky is dirty

picnic 2001, Juhani palmun varjossa

Some torture

Infantile culture that does not wish to grow up because it insists on being on the right even when it constantly stands on the wrong.

It is a culture which adores youthfulness and narrow beauty standards and wishes everyone to follow and want the same, believe the same lie of what is beautiful and what is worth while to pursue and reach for, worth while to dream about. All the people who want to represent the same image of clean perfection with piles of  money is a weird world of brainwash, manipulation and greed, idea that you do not have any other alternative than to fit in, that any other kind of success is not possible because it would not be success. It is a monoculture even though it is said to have been a melting pot without having melted much in, not inhaling but holding breath. Culture that uses surveillance as God is on its side putting oneself on the position of God because it has the right, it is on the right. This culture has clear fascist ideals which it does not admit to be fascist because fascism for them equals Nazism and that is long gone. Fascist ideals which it implements freely without having to deal with the reality of its ideology because it denies every allegation and wrong doing or that there might be anything wrong. Fascism and imperialism which ideologies it also spreads around the globe as good and hugely profitable and therefore accepted. Those who speak against are against all of them, unlikable, rude and terrorists who get propaganda kind of accusations and will be painted malaise. It is not good to be against something that is good, right? Culture of instant gratification, satisfaction that one will want more of because you are worth it. What one is worth in a culture like this is as much as one has wealth nothing more.

Here comes the joke:
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-david-letterman-retires-history-top-ten-list-20150501-htmlstory.htmlLetterman’s ”Late Show” program on CBS. They were originally intended as a parody of Good Housekeeping magazine’s ”Most Admired Men” list.

The topic of the first list was the inauspicious ”Top Ten Words That Almost Rhyme With ’Peas.'”

Yes I love Seinfeld.

Feminism is against fascism, slavery, discrimination of any kind, bullying, killing, abuse, extortion, torture, rip off and exploitation. Feminism is for equal human rights, freedom of expression, peace, right and freedom to live in peace, freedom for everybody to speak their minds, to be heard, taken seriously, respected and valued as individuals who are feeling and thinking people.

To those who this rings bells you might be a feminist. Feminist the activist, advocate of rights of women and children and therefore of all people, boys and girls. Feminist usually is a woman who is not afraid to speak up and act for those who need help, are in need and she helps herself because there often is a deep personal experience of discrimination, sexism that has happened over and over again in patterns and ways that do not change until they are forced to change. Feminist is the one who is not afraid to be trashed by many for her belief in equality, to be herself, who is not afraid to protest in a way she sees fit, usually in provocative way making many angry because there truly are plenty of people who do not want human rights for all nor equality to apply all, people who want to protect rights of the rich, white females and males, protect power of the elite, white power, male power, patriarchy or whatever that is called nowadays. Feminism is not a movement that would not have a mission today, quite on a contrary. It has got plenty to accomplish.
Why is this so confusing?
http://radicalsoapbox.com/is-neo-liberalism-really-fascism-light/ ”This elite owns the privatised public sector, which includes gas, electricity, water, telecommunications, airports, air traffic control, airlines, railways, bus services, and most recently the Royal Mail. The outsourcing companies run an ever-increasing part of our public services, covering social security, correctional services, employment services, the NHS, the disabled, the educational sector, the care sector, etc.
Today, it is conveniently forgotten that the financial base of household names such as ThyssenKrupp, Mercedes, BMW, VW, Porsche and Hugo Boss all came from the vast profits made under the Nazi government, when there were no unions, few regulations and cheap labour – very often slave labour from the concentration camps.

 

What does independence mean?

There is a perfume ad that I saw on TV recently with Gwyneth Paltrow saying her lines telling about a passing moment in a woman’s life, wearing the product, wearing power and wealth, independence and strength, black suit and stiletto heels. The woman in the picture is strong and independent as she has perfected herself, according to the story, to fit a culture which desires wealth and likes to display it, where people are what they look like. Looking like a career woman breathing and posing strength in LA and of LA after a party walking out of a black car on an empty street, car with a chauffeur. Problematic of the concept independence is as tricky as is freedom, as any basic concept that we base our morals and modern lives on.

A grown up is supposed to be independent, not under a guardian needing taking care of, not fragile nor sick. Independent is balanced and aware of one’s position, independence something one had to gain and be proud of, a position in relation to others. It is interesting how a smell that one can spray on is like a last touch of luxury, finishing and a trim to make a person feel certain and sure of herself and make people around notice it by smelling her around, only this is for own pleasure. Her enjoyment is important and what she makes of it. Perfected fantasies that perfume ads make are surely fun to make as makers can create illusions and glittering floating images that reflect the idea of a perfume on a woman, what it means for a woman to wear a good smell, how sure and confident it makes her feel. Sprayed images of beauty, light like feather and fairies: Is it why we desire luxury objects for what they make of us or to show what I have made of myself?

 

Why is it still difficult for women to find work as artists and be given sufficient credit for their work?

There are so many things that need to be done something about what comes to women’s rights as workers, creative makers: to be independent and respected as such, respected for their work and having freedom of expression. Question is why the task of finding equality, equal opportunities, is taking so long and the road is bumpy as hell? Why such reluctant viewpoint on change and equal rights, repulsion against women’s points of view, all kinds of women? Only answer I can think of is that there are people who do not want women to have power, power to make decisions, show perspectives of different. There are people to whom women are frightening, especially women who know what they want and are not afraid to express their ideas and thoughts.
Why women as artists still need, obviously, more proving their talent than men, proving their art is valuable as pieces of art and part of our culture, not as some abnormalities? Women as artists bring value to the whole community, their stories are interesting, universal and unifying therefore worth while looking into and share. Movie industry is a good example of the rule of white men who do not seek anything other than making money. This conclusion I make as I follow what kind of movies get the most advertising and get noticed by media. Media and movie industry work together in this as does TV. The bigger the better has a testosterone impact all over and anything else gets rolled over. Anything marginal is getting past way too hastily, because it may not sell enough. That is a dead-end way to do art, produce living culture and do business. Things produced that we notice in every day stand out at news stands, fast food restaurants, magazines, on the internet with huge force. This in mind problem of inequality and what gets made and is made interesting by PR is acute and rooted to the whole culture of entertainment and art. Luring and exciting do hit strikingly and very much as a gender-issue as how culture is given to us. This is a responsibility issue, because we learn to watch either variety of things which inspire us, or monotonously something factory-produced, easy and ready-chewed entertainment which brings an ecstatic boost. A monoculture of white men telling how entertainment and art are produced, what gets made for us see like there was nothing else will hopefully soon be over. There is work to be done.

Article picks addressing important feminist issues:
http://msmagazine.com/blog/2015/05/13/aclu-goes-after-hollywoods-gender-gap/ ”Without the insight and experience of women, the entertainment media runs the risk of telling stories that not only fail the Bechdel Test but also rob audiences of a deeper understanding of the female experience. … There is a huge audience for storytelling that gives voice to everyone standing in line behind all the straight white men.”

http://blog.eros.com/feminist-porn/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter 

Performer Kelly Shibari Is Confused By Feminist Porn

Glaring body, origin of, pulled out of something beautiful. Out of that glaring body and it is still shining its light like a lamppost on a dark street.

His naivety became to signify fear, to mean good at heart or young inexperienced mind, trusting or having lived with only one perspective to a view.
Her naivety became to signify fear, to mean good at heart, which is more easy to say, that it was she who is naive, still. Unchanged as she remains, trusting, believing, faithful and true. That is what naive means, in a way. You do not change when you don’t have to or because you are afraid and believe truths of others instead of your own. When you are afraid the truth of your own, afraid because it may end up hurting you, because it is not the truth of the most of the world. Or maybe it is but they are afraid of it too.

Sharing is caring. Is gossiping about social skills or lack of them?

Ethically produced knowledge and learning? Sure thing, don’t know about the ethics though, a production, yes. Stand point to gossip is that it is all around, unavoidable as it seems. Why people do it? It obviously plays the essential part of entertaining as everyday soap without TV. Why do you think even though we know it is morally wrong and there is no justification to gossip people find gossip appealing? It brings together similar minded jackasses and separates those who can be discussed about. Gossip sure has a place in society, but why through doing harm we look for something interesting, excitement and shock value. Good and nice are not enough, boring maybe? We need the shock, danger, exposure, element of forbidden in digging other people’s lives and to seek humiliation on others, shame of those who are in the spotlight? Obviously, why else bad talk would flourish to the extent it does. Gossiping is a major seller of goods and magazines making celebrities. It is an emotional boost of either wanting what that other fabulous person has or loathing and hating someone to exclude them, make them feel bad about themselves. I see it merely as public expression of emotions and desires, which has very little to do with reason. Gossip is psychological warfare, violence and shows the ugly side of people, of those who gossip. getting things out of proportion, out of context, false and to make the talker look better than the one who is talked about. It is much a moral issue in which those who make gossip think have morals on their side, have higher morals than and know what is morally right. Gossiping people do not see anything wrong in their behavior until they are caught. It is a mental assault to team against someone, cruel, bullying, hurtful and ruthless. It does not stop until it is stopped.

If I look at the phenomenon of word getting around, it is irreversible and damaging. Gossip is targeting with a purpose, practical with a specific meaning. In that way it is very social, needs relations and skills to spread. If you really don’t know what you are talking about, why don’t you keep your fucking mouth shut. If your only purpose is to harm those you for some reason do not like, you have got some serious issues that need tending.

http://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2005/04/gossip.aspx ”For example, it has been theorized that gossip played a fundamental role in the evolution of human intelligence and social life (Dunbar, 2004; Davis & McLeod, 2003) and that it continues to play an active role in cultural learning (Baumeister, Zhang, & Vohs, 2004) and as a source of social comparison information (Suls, 1977; Wert & Salovey, 2004a). To be sure, it is often noted that rumor and gossip can also be undeniably aversive and problematic-currently illustrated, for example, in the way that rumor and gossip have generated resistance to medical efforts to deal with HIV and AIDS (e.g., Smith, Lucas, & Latkin, 1999; Stadler, 2003).”

If it is good, huray! Cheeky then wehey! Blog sensations: News Agency for the good ppl. Don’t forget to share. Check your facts or/and check your head.

hmm let’s see: rumors, bad talk, backstabbing, isolation, killing. This is my advise to all: You can never educate yourself enough. Never forget.

Most puzzling fact is that witch-hunt is still a widely used convention and a needed method to keep society and women scared and therefore unchanged and chained. 
Surely we all know meaning of negative social behavior and what is seen as negative.

Laparoscopic Gynecologic Anatomy

ANATOMY; FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM by Professor Fink